75 Top Professors and Leading Scientists Claim 9/11 Was ‘Inside Job’

The 9/11 terrorist attack on America which left almost 3,000 people dead was an “inside job”, according to a group of leading academics.

Around 75 top professors and leading scientists believe the attacks were puppeteered by war mongers in the White House to justify the invasion and the occupation of oil-rich Arab countries.

leading scientists say the facts of their investigations cannot be ignored and say they have evidence that points to one of the biggest conspiracies ever perpetrated.

911 (2)

Professor Steven Jones, who lectures in physics at the Brigham Young University in Utah, says the official version of events is the biggest and most evil cover up in history.

He has joined the 9/11 Scholars for Truth whose membership includes up to 75 leading scientists and experts from universities across the US.

Prof Jones said:  We don’t believe that 19 hijackers and a few others in a cave in Afghanistan pulled this off acting alone.

“We challenge this official conspiracy theory and, by God, we’re going to get to the bottom of this.”

In essays and journals, the scientists are giving credence to many of the conspiracy theories that have circulated on the internet in the past five years.

Read More: 24 Hard Facts About 9/11 That Cannot Be Debunked

They believe a group of US neo-conservatives called the Project for a New American Century, set on US world dominance, orchestrated the 9/11 attacks as an excuse to hit Iraq, Afghanistan and later Iran.

The group says scientific evidence over the attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon is conclusive proof.

Professor Jones said it was impossible for the twin towers to have collapsed in the way they did from the collision of two aeroplanes.

Read More: Ex-CIA Pilot Gives Sworn Testimony That No Planes Hit The Twin Towers

He maintains jet fuel does not burn at temperatures high enough to melt steel beams and claims horizontal puffs of smoke seen during the collapse of the towers are indicative of controlled explosions used to bring down the towers.

The group also maintains World Trade Centre 7 – a neighbouring building which caught fire and collapsed later in the day – was only partially damaged but had to be destroyed because it housed a clandestine CIA station.

Professor James Fetzer, 65, a retired philosopher of science at the University of Minnesota, said: “The evidence is so overwhelming, but most Americans don’t have time to take a look at this.”

The 9/11 Commission dismissed the numerous conspiracy theories after its exhaustive investigation into the terror attacks.

Subsequent examinations of the towers’ structure have sought to prove they were significantly weakened by the impact which tore off fire retardant materials and led the steel beams bending under heat and then collapsing.

Christopher Pyle, professor of constitutional law at Mt Holyoake College in Massachusetts, has dismissed the academic group.

He said: “To plant bombs in three buildings with enough bomb materials and wiring? It’s too huge a project and would require far too many people to keep it a secret afterwards.

“After every major crisis, like the assassinations of JFK or Martin Luther King, we’ve had conspiracy theorists who come up with plausible scenarios for gullible people. It’s a waste of time.”

But University of Wisconsin assistant professor, Kevin Barrett, said experts are unwilling to believe theories which don’t fit into their belief systems.

Read: Larry Silverstein Bought WTC Months Before 9/11: He Got $4.55 Billion Insurance For The Buildings!

He said: “People will disregard evidence it if causes their faith to be shattered. I think we were all shocked. And then, when the voice of authority told us what happened, we just believed it.”

MUST SEE Professor Steven Jones on the Controlled Demolition Of WTC Demolition

Source: dailymail

You may also like...

25 Responses

  1. John says:

    “He said: “To plant bombs in three buildings with enough bomb materials and wiring? It’s too huge a project and would require far too many people to keep it a secret afterwards.”
    That is if they where not killed afterwards , so investigate how many explosive experts died in the years directly after the
    911 event could give an insight in this. I know of one who did give his comment on the building 7 colaps died in a road accident. He had nothing to do with 911 ,but he had given his opinion about the building 7 collaps to a journalist,and said
    that it certainly was a controlled explosion. He was a demolition expert from Europe.

  2. PithHelmut says:

    Christopher Pyle sounds like he’s had a lobotomy. Where’s your brain sir? Humans study lots of things but few study conspiracy theories. Jim Fetzer is such a one. And he has a Ph.D as well as other notable credentials under this belt. What the lobotomized Pyle doesn’t understand is the method by which the perpetrators of these false flag attacks use to get away with it. They’ve been using this method for eons. We’re all part of it but we barely know. The professional world is zoomed in on their specialized field. It’s almost unheard of that a professional in one field understands the intricacies of other fields of expertise. Professions and fields of study are “siloed”. The trick is in joining the dots like Jim Fetzer does. This enables the dirty deeds to be done without suspicion while they’re being carried out.

    There are two ways the buildings could have been demolished IMO:

    1. By having a demolition plan prepared well before the construction of the property and nuclear devices implanted in and under the building in preparation for the circumstance of them having to be demolished down the road.

    2. Implanting the explosives after the building is built by renovating the building and leaving areas prepared for the last phase, the wiring of the explosives and lines. This could take place in an elevator renovation for example. The ostensible work would leave the necessary space unfinished in preparation for the next phase which the construction team would be told was either a design element or another process of some sort they could trump up, like the installation of the building’s alarm system. The construction team would not have a clue what dastardly deeds the masters are up to! The construction team would do their job and move on to the next contract site. That is when the explosives team comes in and installs the explosives. The story to the facilities staff could be that they need the building over the weekend for the testing of the elevators. This would only require a very few people who would know. That’s part of their method, keeping the numbers down to the very few. All the others in the construction team would have no idea and would say they worked on it and nothing was untoward.

    That only leaves a few to kill off if needed while the other loyal subjects would be used for future secret projects. I’m sure they are paid very handsomely! The masters know how to keep the numbers to an absolute minimum. They have all the information at their disposal. Even moreso now as we have been so heavily surveiled since 9/11.

    Though it’s coming apart at the seams. I would hazard a guess that they do have a contingency should someone or something go wrong and things look like it’s about to go mainstream. Could it be the war in the Ukraine? An insurgence into Syria to pretend they’re going after ISIS? We’ll see soon I would imagine.

    • Laurence Fitzgerald says:

      You’re an idiot. Every ridiculous point in this article has been debunked by people who know what they are talking about. The deaths that day were real, and each of the dead left survivors who are highly motivated to find out how their loved ones died. Enough very rich people lost enough money that day that if they could find someone with deep pockets to blame that they could recover their losses from, they would have. Your scenarios seem plausible because you have no idea what you’re talking about. Real experts have looked at the possibilities and have determined that Islamic Fundamentalists hijacked 4 planes that day and turned three of them into weapons of mass destruction and the fourth was flown into the ground when the passengers attempted to overcome the hijackers. That’s not horrific enough for you? You have to have something worse to harp on? Or are you so incapable of admitting that a small determined force with limited means could strike the US in such a way that you somehow have to make it about smarter and better prepared Americans being the only people who could have pulled this off?

  3. James says:

    Zionist are going to keep control of the USA as long as they can with Media , Politics and Banking ! Americans are the CANNON FODDER for Zionist ! GOYIM IS ALL YOU ARE TO ZIONIST !

  4. Krist Martin says:

    1) I’ve already explained how and why the Twin Towers fell as they did using physics.
    2) It wasn’t 19 hijackers in caves but 19 hijackers in the US who had the time, money, and resources to plan out the attack.
    3) Perpetuating conspiracy theories that twist facts do nothing more than cloudy the truth.

  5. Stephen says:

    Just noticed at 3:18… what shape is the hole in the side of the tower? It looks like a plane. So, if no plane hit the building, then how did ‘they’ make a hole that looks like a plane did hit the building?

    • davidr says:

      The very fact that it is plane shaped tell us a lot about the structure of the tower and the plane. I’m still trying to work out what material they used to build the plane. It’s usually light-weight material such as an aluminium alloy to carbon fibre, but in this case it looks like they’ve used balsa wood for the girders and joists, such is the impression of the plane severing many of them simultaneously.

  6. davidr says:

    I remember watching this unfold live here in the UK. I remember a Journalist opined that both buildings would collapse. I thought this was ignorance at the time and still do. I have a few Engineer friends of different disciplines, (I’m a Chartered Electrical Engineer); I asked the Structural Engineer what he thought – he never thought the buildings would collapse from the day deadly deed was perpetrated and it is a similar opinion of the Civil Engineer. My layman, electrical opinion was that the buildings wouldn’t collapse and here in the UK it is (or at least was), a requirement to carry out MCA, (maximum credible accident), analysis in order to ascertain catastrophic failure and mitigating actions. Has the organisation which built these towers ever defended themselves?

    • Laurence Fitzgerald says:

      When the car bomb went off in the underground parking garage, news reports reminded people that when the Towers were first built they were built to survive a 727 crashing into them. That got the bad guys thinking, “What about a much bigger plane?” Which is what they used, and therefore succeeded. Engineers knew the larger planes could bring the buildings down, and they did.

  7. ChezHozay says:

    I would like to see this guys doctor. That’s some good shit he’s smoking and someone’s bogarting the source…

  8. TruthTeller says:

    Its absolutely mind blowing that people think this is all a “conspiracy” theory. Open your eyes and your minds. Quit being such brainwashed degenerates…. It’s sickening.

    • davidr says:

      I’m not a degenerate and I’m certainly not brainwashed. I can’t afford to be in the job I do.

      The Professional Engineer/Scientists look at any and every possibility as to why an event happened. They aren’t as you suggest brainwashed degenerates. Are the eminent scientists and engineers investigating this brainwashed degenerates? I fancy not.

  9. foreveryoung says:

    Laurence Fitzgerald you are the idiot so totally brainwashed that even when the sky is blue you’d say it was yellow.

  10. Frank Castle says:

    Bunk.. these building were non interior column support EXOSKELETON designed…. when the support of a few floors above failed…. they fell like a stack of plates.. one on top of the other.. straight down….

    • davidr says:

      I really don’t think that design would sit well with a Design Review Committee. It probably wouldn’t get past the preliminary stage (in the UK anyway).

  11. Clive says:

    So what are we going to do about it?

    • davidr says:

      I would suspect nothing. All of these people offering their expert opinion are quite happy to go back into their shells. They’re more likely than not, low-achievers who prefer to sit in their favourite chair or sit in their bedroom listening to their bestest Slipknot CD.

  12. davidr says:

    Scientists and Engineers ask questions. They have enquiring minds. They’re certainly not mental midgets, but as a duty of care they will consider any possible event in their investigation. I have done many investigations; some which were relatively easy and others which lasted near on a year, such was the complexity of the failure. Problem-solving skills such as root cause failure analysis, cause mapping, global structuring notation, prognostic results and diagnostic results, Bayesian statistical inference, Weibull Analysis, DMAIC, elicitation and inferences are all used if required.

  13. redgriffin says:

    So what they are saying is the Democrats have “The Illuminate” and the Republicans have “The Project” . On great someone go to the lobby to get me a program so I know all the player. Because I have proof that bin Laden was the 3rd shooter at Dallas.

  14. Athos says:

    That’s the one thing no one explains or discusses. It must mean something.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *