UK Man Wins Court Case Against BBC for 9/11 Cover Up

Tony Rooke refused to pay a TV license fee because the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks, he alleged. It is widely known that the BBC reported the collapse of World.

Trade Center Building 7 over 20 minutes before it occurred. WTC 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane on 9/11 but collapsed at free-fall speed later that day.

So Rooke said the BBC had to have had prior knowledge to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack. He presented the BBC footage to the judge along with a slew of other evidence, and the judge agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case to protest. Rooke was found not guilty and he was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee.

Below is the broadcast where the BBC announced the collapse of WTC 7 while it was still standing behind the reporter.

via: topinfopost.

You may also like...

6 Responses

  1. Jane Dough says:

    well . . . . what do you know? prior knowledge huh? hmmmmmmmmm really shocking lol

  2. Building 7 was destroyed because the building 7 housed all archived documents of the FBI and CIA.

  3. mimranyameen says:

    BBC, Fox and other media giants are so desperate to become the highest rating channels.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *